While the folks around me complained of 2, 3, even 4-hour commutes into Manhattan these past three days, I had the opposite experience with some of my fastest trips ever.
After the one horrendous day working at home, I decided Wednesday to get my ass into the office. I slung my laptop over my shoulder and biked in. Stupid me, I did not pay attention to the news that 5th was closed to vehicles. So instead of scooting down that Avenue to the Flat Iron district, I risked my life down smog-choked, gridlocked Lexington. 55 minutes.
That night I locked my bike in the office and ran home. This time I was wise to the empty emergency lane on Madison and bolted home in 42 minutes.
The best commute by far was Thursday morning, when I actually did make use of the 5th Avenue emergency lane . I felt on top form and simply flew to work. 39 minutes. As Dianna from my club just
commented, she was simultaneously biking into work, and the two of us were neck-in-neck the entire way (thanks Dianna - that made it even more fun!) I was moving pretty fast, it's true, but I think her inability to get ahead of me is that bikes are
way less manoeverable than people on city roads. Hurrah for running :o)
And one last bike home up Madison last night rounded off my strike-commuting. This trip was definitely the most dangerous of them all. The 7 billion confused policemen that lined the emergency lane seemed unable to decided whether us cyclists should be using it or not; some of them kept forcing us out of it into traffic. I expected at any moment to be sandwiched between a lorry and a taxi, or thrown 50 feet across lanes by a bus, but somehow I got home unscathed. 50 minutes.
Why the hell did the powers-that-be open most of 5th Ave back up to regular traffic yesterday? It's such backward logic! Soooooooo
stupid! Shouldn't the main message throughout this entire strike have been: if at all possible, do not, DO NOT take a car into Manhattan. If you able- bodied and under 100 years of age, please, please, please use your own two feet (or small, wheeled non-motorized contraptions) to transport yourself to where you need to be. Why was their main concern easing congestion for car drivers and hence
reducing the available space for the fit, sensible and enviro-friendly runners, walkers, cyclists, roller-bladers etc. among us?
Why make it much more dangerous and difficult for those of us who are trying to do the city a favour? I seriously don't get it.
And what excuse did most people have for taking a car into Manhattan anyway? What possesses people to put up with a 3 hour car ride, when they could have gotten to their destination via a 1-hour walk? I know there must probably be a couple of good reasons, but honestly - not
that many.
I was a little bemused by the presence of Red Cross vans at either ends of the 59th Bridge during the strike. I mean, it's considerate of them and all, but a little frightening that there should exist the worry that commuters may drop dead as a result of 1.4 mile saunter over the east river. I really hope this strike was a wake-up call for at least a handful of people who struggled. Perhaps they should start considering doing a little regular e-x-e-r-c-i-s-e.
Anyway, it's over now, and we can all breathe a huge sigh of relief that this great city can get back to the way it's meant to be, and not like every other huge metropolis out there in the US that has no mass transit (how on earth do people
cope with that
every day?!). But the end came just as I was starting to garner immense satisfaction at being able to move faster around New York than 8 million others (did I mention I'm competitive?)
New Yorkers, if you're harbouring any residual resentment about this strike, click
here. Be warned: do not play this at work, or around children. Thanks to Jaime for the laugh.